Nerds

Respond to Posts

Take a look at two separate instruments provided by your peers on

#wk4-conspiracy

Without contacting them, try to interpret what is being measured and provide feedback where you think they could improve. Please use the the column table layout1 below.

  1. Open a blank copy of the following Word icon

  2. Create a four column table with the following headers

    index

    measure

    group

    changes

    where the

    1. index is an item number given in order of appearance

    2. measure is your guess about the associated measure

    3. group is your guess about the associated group of items, if applicable

    4. changes is a brief description of all recommended alterations, if applicable

  3. Include any general feedback within the body of the post

Download Literature

Read Some Papers

For the readings below, write a single post on Slack addressing the task:

TitlePaperTaskPostLink
An Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Nerdy Personality Attributes Scale in a Sample of Self-identified Nerds/geeksFinister, C., Pollet, T. V., & Neave, N. (2021)This week is related to critiquing. First read both articles and then pick one to critique, in particular scrutinize the measures used and use what we’ve covered in the required readings for your justifications. Please remember to cite your sources.#wk5-nerdsSlack icon
A Psychological Exploration of Engagement in Geek CultureMcCain, J., Gentile, B., & Campbell, W. K. (2015)

Read Some Text

TitleSectionLink
Item AnalysisChapter VI
ValidityChapter IX

  1. Your responses to postings should follow the same basic criteria outlined in the original post. Remember to use the Reply in thread option when responding to receive credit. ↩︎